From cf0e1a8a00a156b09e17bac2d5c1aee4bca68610 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: andrea Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2026 22:13:50 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] added link to Sagrada Familia --- README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 50f8702..c67cdfd 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Gaudí himself reportedly argued that architecture should operate according to t *“Architecture creates the organism. Therefore, it must be governed by a law in harmony with those of nature.”* his philosophy has contributed to his reputation as a visionary. It has also provided ammunition for those who regard his work as excessive, theatrical or deliberately irrational. -The controversy was particularly evident in reactions to the Sagrada Família. Architectural historian Nikolaus Pevsner criticised the organic appearance of Gaudí's buildings, while George Orwell famously described the Sagrada Família as “one of the most hideous buildings in the world.” By contrast, architect Louis Sullivan praised it as “the greatest piece of creative architecture in the last twenty-five years.” +The controversy was particularly evident in reactions to the \[Sagrada Família\]\(https://en\.wikipedia\.org/wiki/Sagrada\_Fam%C3%ADlia\)\. Architectural historian Nikolaus Pevsner criticised the organic appearance of Gaudí's buildings\, while George Orwell famously described the Sagrada Família as “one of the most hideous buildings in the world\.” By contrast\, architect Louis Sullivan praised it as “the greatest piece of creative architecture in the last twenty\-five years\.” The disagreement raises a question that has never been completely resolved: **if architecture provokes radically opposing reactions, does that indicate failure—or success?** -- 2.49.1